Price, Investment and Leasing Data for the British Columbia ITQ Halibut Fishery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The data that is presented here was aggregated and consolidated to inform the research presented in the dissertation (under review) Edwards, D., Addressing Questions on the Social and Economic Outcomes of an Individual Transferable Quota Fishery, A dissertation to be submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy, University of British Columbia and in the paper Edwards, D., & Pinkerton, E. (2019), The Hidden Role of Processors in an Individual Transferable Quota Fishery. Ecology and Society, In Press. This document describes the sources and methodology used for these data inputs. The source data is provided in accompanying files. The data sources presented here are all publicly available, compiled from multiple sources including published reports, online datasets, a government pay for access dataset (BC Online corporate registry), and government data requests (through the federal Access to Information process). A file providing additional background on the data presented, including data sources, is included.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.012 | 0.017 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it