Caracterización de comunidades hidrobiológicas del río Ocoa (Villavicencio) para evaluar su estado ambiental a través de indicadores biológicos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El recurso documenta la información asociada a los registros biológicos obtenidos durante un monitoreo rápido en cuatro puntos del río Ocoa, estos puntos fueron establecidos a lo largo del cauce del río con el objetivo de comprender las complejas dinámicas de las comunidades biológicas en un entorno urbano sometido a múltiples presiones antropogénicas. Los cuatro puntos de muestreo incluyen uno en la zona alta de la cuenca (origen del Río), uno posterior a la recepción de vertimientos de aguas negras e industriales, uno después de recibir los vertimientos del alcantarillado de la ciudad y afluentes urbanos, y el último, antes de la confluencia con el Río Guayuriba. Se realizó el monitoreo en os periodos climáticos para comprender las variaciones estacionales y evaluar la resiliencia del ecosistema fluvial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".