MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6943829491 · doi:10.17632/2t4b33ftst

Bud phenology data

2020· dataset· en· W6943829491 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenologyGrowing seasonAnnual growth cycle of grapevinesFrost (temperature)TaigaphotoperiodismTemperate climateWhorl (mollusc)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains phenological observations (stored as numbers from 0-6) of white spruce (3 seed sources), black spruce (1 seed source) and Norway spruce (4 seed sources) buds in spring gathered over 2 years (2016-2017) on trees growing in two plantations that were established in two different blioclimate zones in eastern Canada (the northern temperate forest and the boreal mixedwood forest). For each tree, the terminal bud of all branches belonging to the whorl at breast height were observed weekly. We identified inter- and intraspecies variation in bud break timing and in sensitivity to environmental cues (frost probability, GDD, photoperiod) for each phenological stage. We found that spring frosts and photoperiod control the firsts phenological stages and GDD controls the lasts phenological stages which highlights an important ecological trade-off between the maximizing the growing season length and limit frost damage from too early bud burst.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesOpen science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0390.056
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.272

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.272
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataFrench-language works237,207