Widespread occurrence of B. dendrobatidis in Ontario, Canada, and predicted habitat suitability for the emerging B. salamandrivorans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crawshaw, L., Buchanan. T., Shirose, L., Palahnuk, A., Cai, H.Y., Bennett, A.M., Jardine, C.M., Davy, C.M. We conducted surveillance for two chytrid fungi (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and B. salamandrivorans) in south-central Canada, in an area where previous niche modelling suggests low habitat suitability for B. dendrobatidis. Sampling of 1041 amphibians across Ontario and Akimiski Island (Nunavut) revealed that B. dendrobatidis is ubiquitous in our study area, but did not detect B. salamandrivorans. Niche models informed by these data show high habitat suitability for B. dendrobatidis, and temperature models suggest high habitat suitability for B. salamandrivorans if it is introduced, emphasizing the need for enhanced coordinated, trans-boundary regulation of trade and surveillance of potential pathways of transmission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.198 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".