Effectiveness of Isolation/Quarantine in Reducing Transmission of Respiratory Infectious Diseases (i.e., COVID-19, H1N1, SARS, and MERS) and Its Impact on Individual and Societal Outcomes in Non-Healthcare Community-Based Settings: A Rapid Review of Evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this rapid evidence synthesis is to evaluate the effectiveness of quarantine and isolation for reducing transmission of COVID-19 and other respiratory infectious diseases in non-healthcare community-based settings. Additionally, it aims to identify potential negative outcomes associated with quarantine and isolation. The rapid evidence synthesis seeks to provide the Canadian government with timely and reliable information to inform decision-making and policy development during the pandemic. Isolation and quarantine have been used to diminish the transmission of communicable diseases in cases of outbreaks all throughout history. In addition, these methods often require individuals to be away from their loved ones or confined to a specific room for an extended period of time. The aims of the present rapid systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of isolation and quarantine in decreasing the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases (i.e., COVID-19, H1N1, SARS, and MERS) as well as to determine what might be the unintended consequences of these measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".