Assessing a Nutrition Educational Tool for Adolescents Undergoing Bariatric Surgery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bariatric surgery (BS) is a safe and effective treatment in adolescents (<19 y) who live with severe obesity that impairs daily living.1-3 The primary nutritional concern after BS is to ensure adequate dietary protein intake4-5 to avoid loss of muscle mass.6 As such, incorporating high-protein foods is crucial both to prevent the loss of muscle mass and also to provide a vital source of energy. However, because most BS occurs in adults (>18 y), there are very few nutrition education resources intended specifically for adolescents. This highlights the urgent need to support adolescents with their post-operative nutrition. Nutritional tool: Protein Cards is a newly-developed nutrition tool that includes forty post-MBS protein recipes intended for adolescents who have undergone bariatric surgery (BS). The resource is available in English and French, and has been reviewed and refined after feedback from dietitians at both Centre of Excellence in Adolescent Severe Obesity ((Montreal Children’s Hospital, Montreal QC) and the Healthy Living Clinic (The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto ON). The purpose of the Protein Cards book is to help patients meet their protein requirements during post-BS diet progression stages (i.e., fluid, purée, soft, and regular diet) and acquire the skills to incorporate protein into their diet. The tool also incorporates a new method of calculating protein intake. Instead of itemizing foods by grams of protein, each 10 grams of protein are depicted using a yogurt icon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it