MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6944094698 · doi:10.17863/cam.106872

Petitioning and Political Culture in Late Company Madras, 1830-1860

2023· dissertation· en· W6944094698 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueApollo (University of Cambridge) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDalhousie University
KeywordsPresidencyPoliticsColonialismDemiseNationalismPolitical culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation studies the development of reformist political culture in South India during the last decades of East India Company rule in the mid-nineteenth century. Through an analysis of a wide-ranging body of South Indian sources, including mass petitions (some signed by as many as 70,000 individuals), pamphlets, speeches, polemical writings, and the transactions of public meetings, it reveals a vigorous political culture existed in the understudied presidency of Madras. Incorporating archival material from British and Indian archives, this dissertation dissects the life-cycles, that is the origins and short and long-term effects, of mid-century colonial mass petitions. It does so by analysing the correspondence and deliberations that preceded a petition’s release, the processes by which it was circulated for signature, and the consequent resolutions and debates that followed its reception by colonial authorities. I argue that the petition, in its most public and political iteration, was seized by reformers who anticipated, and sought to direct, the dramatic structural changes that transformed the embattled Company before its demise in 1858. This dissertation applies a close reading of six petitionary campaigns that demanded, in turn, education reform, religious protections, political representation, the restoration of annexed Rajas, the reconstitution of the presidency system, and, perhaps most dramatically, the abolition of the Company itself. Instead of identifying these campaigns as precursors to the nationalist politics of the late nineteenth century, I argue that they marked a distinct phase of colonial politics that sought to mould the colonial state and its policies. By approaching the history of anti-Company politics from the contexts of southern India and Britain, this dissertation proposes a multi-sited account of the transition to Crown rule that reincorporates the Madras presidency as a venue of radical political innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApollo (University of Cambridge)Same topicPolitical Theory and InfluenceFrench-language works237,207