MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6944113996 · doi:10.17632/d7vzpcdzcw.2

CrimeDataBD

2025· dataset· en· W6944113996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData sourceSocioeconomic statusDistribution (mathematics)Data collectionEconomic crime

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Type of data: Crime records in CSV format with numerical and textual values. Data format: CSV. Number of samples: 6,574 instances. Crimes considered: Murder, Rape, Assault, Robbery, Kidnap, Body Found. Number of classes: Six (corresponding to the crime categories). Distribution of instances: Varies across crime types based on real-world occurrences. How data are acquired: • Crime data collected from newspapers. • Socioeconomic data sourced from the National Census. • Weather data retrieved from a Weather API. Data source locations: Bangladesh. Where applicable: Suitable for crime classification, forecasting, and crime analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesOpen science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0120.012
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataFrench-language works237,207