I vicoli ciechi: spazialita e socialita nelle medine del Nord Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the urban network of the North African medinas, one can distinguish an intricate web of main streets, side streets, in which every individual has the right to circulate, and cul-de-sacs that are considered private co-owned spaces. These circumstances then gave rise to the winding character of large parts of the medina. All this reflects a mental attitude, which is expressed in the owners' tendency to build intimate and domestic places, reserved for the family, trying in every way to limit the view. On this very point, the research underlines the importance of the role played by the family, which strongly influenced urban morphology and the built environment, often prevailing over the very constraints regulated in Islamic legal texts. Nella rete urbana delle medine nordafricane si può distinguere un'articolata trama di strade principali, strade secondarie, in cui ogni individuo ha il diritto di circolare, e vicoli ciechi considerati spazi privati in comproprietà. Queste circostanze particolari hanno poi dato origine al carattere tortuoso di ampie zone della medina. Tutto ciò riflette un atteggiamento mentale, che si esprime nella tendenza dei proprietari a costruire luoghi intimi e domestici, riservati alla famiglia, cercando in ogni modo di limitarne la vista. Proprio su questo punto, la ricerca sottolinea l’importanza del ruolo svolto dalla famiglia, che ha fortemente influenzato la morfologia urbana e l'ambiente costruito, spesso prevalendo sugli stessi vincoli regolati nei testi giuridici islamici.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".