MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Fast Wire Scanner for the TRIUMF Electron Linac

2018· article· en· W6944214427 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJACOW · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear particle acceleratorBeam (structure)ScannerScintillatorCathode rayPhotomultiplierPower (physics)Range (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The superconducting CW linac presently being commissioned at TRIUMF will accelerate up to 10mA of electrons to the energy of 30 - 50 MeV. Thus, beam powers up to 0.5 MW are eventually expected. To support high beam power operation modes, a Fast Wire Scanner (FWS) capable of velocities up to 3 m/s over a 70mm range was developed. A stepper motor driven helical cam allows for a long stroke enabling two orthogonal wires to scan both axes in one scan. The radiation produced when the wires pass through the beam is detected by a BGO scintillator coupled to a photomultiplier (PMT), while wire position is measured with a precision linear potentiometer. A Struck SIS3302 VME transient recorder, synchronized to the beam pulses, simultaneously captures both signals to produce the beam profiles in the EPICS control system. The design of the FWS and initial beam measurements will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACOWSame topicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron LasersFrench-language works237,207