MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6944437493 · doi:10.18712/nsd-nsd0602-3-v1

Labour Force Survey 2nd quarter 1986 - 3rd quarter 1987, panel file, recoded

2014· dataset· en· W6944437493 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNSD – Norsk senter for forskningsdata · 2014
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical synthesis and alkaloids
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Current Population SurveyPopulationLife tableTable (database)Working populationCensusPanel data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SSB has conducted official quarterly labor force surveys (LFS) from Q1 1972. The survey aims to provide labor authorities and others knowledge about the occupational structure of population and development over time. The surveys provide the basis and statistical material for occupational forecasting and labor market research. In the LFS respondents are interviewed two consecutive quarters, then after two more quarters they are interviewed again in two consecutive quarters. Labour Force Survey 1972 is the first complete LFS year long survey. Originally it was intended that such statistics would be a more analytical supplement to the monthly employment statistics based on the insurance fund membership files. The insurance fund-based statistics, however, fell away when health insurance was included in the National Insurance Scheme from 1 January 1971, the LFS has gradually evolved to become the main source of knowledge about the state of the labor market. General information on the Labour Force Survey: http://www.nsd.uib.no/data/ny_individ/norStudy/aku.html Overview of LFS panels with detailed explanation for panel files: Group 1977|1978|1979|1980|1981|1982|1983|1984|1985|1986|1987| Quarter 1234 |1234|1234|1234|1234|1234|1234|1234|1234|1234|1234| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 52 |____|____|____|____|____|____|___X|X__X|X___|____|____|____| 599_1 = 1985,1 53 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|XX__|XX__|____|____|____| 599_2 = 1985,2 54 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|_XX_|_XX_|____|____|____| 599_3 = 1985,3 55 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|__XX|__XX|____|____|____| 599_4 = 1985,4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 56 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|___X|X__X|X___|____|____| 600_1 = 1986,1 57 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|XX__|XX__|____|____| 600_2 = 1986,2 58 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|_XX_|_XX_|____|____| 600_3 = 1986,3 59 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|__XX|__XX|____|____| 600_4 = 1986,4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 60 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|___X|X__X|X___|____| 601_1 = 1987,1 61 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|XX__|XX__|____| 601_2 = 1987,2 62 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|_XX_|_XX_|____| 601_3 = 1987,3 63 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|__XX|__XX|____| 601_4 = 1987,4 Panel files are created by linking four interviews from an ordinary interview round in LFS. In the table above this means that one could connect all the groups (lines) marked X. Group 1 is removed because the intweviews started 4th quarter 1971. Participation 4 times is used as a selection criterion, therefore everyone that didn't participate in the 4th interview has been omitted. In 1975 SSB changed selection strategy. The groups that were left out due to this (started in 1973 or 1974, should've had one or more interviews in 1975) are removed. Looking at a particular column, for example. Q1 1983, we will see that 1/4 of respondents are included for the 4th time, the 3rd time etc. The total sum of the material for one quarter. Quarterly weights allows one such block (column) to be balanced with national figures. If taking 4 groups and turning them into a year file the weights must be divided by 4 to give proper weighted figures. Panel files goes in the other direction (horizontally) and each panel will have four weights, one for each quarter, and although they do not differ much will they be prepared independently and each weight should be used only for data from the quarterly weight is made. Weighted figures are for a pool, ie ca. 25% of the total quarterly sample and must therefore multiply by 4 to get approximately the national quarterly. With "almost national quarterly" means that since panel connectors innebærerer a certain selection, as it may cause minor differences from the weighted national figures one gets for each quarter This panel file covers group 62 in the table above. The file itself is created later, based on a file description from 1988; the weights in the original file is created to be used on months. Between the 1st and 2nd quarter of 1988 there was a reorganization of the LFS including resulted in a new file description, and that the status codes for status in the labor market changed. The present panel file is located exactly at the forefront of this change, but still follows essentially the file description that was prepared for the change. This has practical reasons, the 9 panel files have the latest interview from Q1 1987 to Q1 1989 was compiled together and transmitted simultaneously from SSB to NSD. However, it created two versions of these panel files: Because the V009, V036 and V073 (status on the labor market) is changed, the data also recoded to obtain comparable data before and after the adjustments between the 1st and 2nd quarter 1988 NSD0603 provides data with original codes, NSD0604 provide encoded data, the entire 1987 and 1988 codes that are comparable with subsequent encoding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNSD – Norsk senter for forskningsdataSame topicChemical synthesis and alkaloidsFrench-language works237,207