MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6944457617 · doi:10.18739/a29g5gf9n

Alaska Community Ice Observations - 2019-2022

2022· dataset· en· W6944457617 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUC Santa Barbara · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShelf iceSnowArcticArctic ice packHydrology (agriculture)Sea iceGlacial lakePermafrost

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains community based observations of ice thickness throughout the winters of 2019/2020, 2020/2021, and 2021/2022. Observations are co-located within or near communities participating in the Fresh Eyes on Ice project, seeking to expand spatial coverage of ice observations and science literacy in classrooms around the state. This spatially distributed dataset provides valuable information about ice thickness through the winter for the period of 2019-2022 on lakes and rivers around Alaska, including Big Lake near Venetie, Alaska, Brown's Slough in Bethel, Alaska, Noyes Slough in Fairbanks, Alaska, the Tanana River near Fairbanks, Alaska, Shageluk Lake near Shageluk, Alaska, Third Lake near Noatak, Alaska, Alexander Lake in Galena, Alaska, Smith Lake near Fairbanks, Alaska, Big Trail Lake near Fairbanks, Alaska, Toolik Lake at Toolik Research Station, Alaska, Jan Lake near Tok, Alaska, Float Pond Lake near Nenana, Alaska, unnamed lakes in the communities of Kenny Lake, Alaska, Arctic Village, Alaska, Sleetmute, Alaska, and McGrath, Alaska, Pippen Lake near Tonsina, Alaska, Yukon River near Eagle, Alaska, Long Lake near Eagle Village, Alaska, Sculpin Lake near Chitina, Alaska, and Dog Pits Lakes near Fairbanks, Alaska . These observations were made by drilling of 3 holes in an undisturbed location at the site by students, teachers, and community members, as well as members of the Fresh Eyes on Ice project. Snow depth was recorded at each of the holes prior to drilling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUC Santa BarbaraFrench-language works237,207