Exploring Regional Differences in Traditional Food Harvesting in Three Northern Indigenous Communities in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Across what is now called Canada, Indigenous communities have been navigating a complex and challenging relationship with food security and food sovereignty. This relationship has been shaped by several factors, including geographical location, depletion of food sources, forced settlement, and the shift toward a wage-based economy, among others. This paper investigates how traditional foods contribute to meeting the energy requirements of three northern Indigenous communities: Clyde River, Moose Cree First Nation, and Old Crow. It begins by exploring the concepts of food security and food sovereignty and their relevance to Indigenous communities. This study highlights the cultural significance of traditional food systems and the lasting impacts of colonization on these relationships. By calculating the Total Energy Expenditure (TEE) for each community and estimating how many of the most hunted and consumed animals would be needed to meet a 17% contribution rate, the research illustrates the scale of harvesting required to sustain these communities. While reaching such targets may not be feasible for all, the findings emphasize the absolute necessity of supporting culturally appropriate, community-led, and ecologically sustainable traditional harvesting practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".