MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6944768875 · doi:10.20381/ruor-30967

Optimizing Large Scale Particle Image Velocimetry Using a Multi Camera System

2025· dissertation· en· W6944768875 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa - Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle image velocimetryVelocimetryStereoscopyChannel (broadcasting)Displacement (psychology)Scale (ratio)Synthetic aperture radarSurface roughness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrometric monitoring plays a vital role in Canada’s environment. It is used for flood monitoring, climate change modelling, water resources engineering design and much more. Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) operates over 2200 hydrometric stations across the country, collecting and publishing near real-time water level and discharge data. Discharge measurements are required to validate rating curves after major rainfall events and periodically throughout the year. Conventional methods can pose safety risks to hydrometric technologists in high flows. Additionally, in flashy streams at remote locations it is challenging to travel to the station in time to obtain the peak discharge. This is where methods such as image velocimetry could be used as an alternative to conventional methods. Numerous surface velocimetry algorithms have been created and adapted for the field, one of which is large scale particle image velocimetry (LSPIV). LSPIV utilizes video recordings of a river surface to estimate the surface velocity field, based on a cross-correlation technique that identifies the displacement between subsequent image frames of surface roughness or scatterers within individual interrogation areas (IA). This study aimed to tackle challenges of both LSPIV and stereoscopic LSPIV. A novel multi-camera LSPIV method was created by combining the best portions of the surface velocity field obtained by each camera. The channel was split in the middle and the portions of the surface velocity field for each half of the channel obtained from the respective adjacent camera were retained and then combined across the cross-section. Single camera LSPIV had absolute percent differences of 11.73%, 26.41%, and 21.05% for the gauge house camera, left bank (bridge) camera and right bank (bridge) camera, respectively, compared to ADCP measurements. The multi-camera method resulted in an improvement compared to the best single camera estimates in four of five surveys and had an absolute average difference of 8.19% compared to the ADCP. The results also reinforced the importance of surface texture and environmental conditions in LSPIV analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa - LibrarySame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207