MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6944783881 · doi:10.18739/a2ng4gs7w

Long-term (2000-2017) response of lake-bottom temperature to climate variation in two adjacent tundra lakes, western Arctic coast, Canada

2020· dataset· en· W6944783881 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueCalifornia Digital Library · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTundraPermafrostArcticClimate changeAtmosphere (unit)The arcticVegetation (pathology)Disturbance (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lakes are principal agents of disturbance to permafrost. Many Arctic lakes are well-mixed in summer, so lake-bottom temperature is associated with thaw-season climate. In winter, the thermal regimes of the atmosphere and lake-bottoms are distinct. Measurements of bottom temperatures on shallow near-shore terraces and in deep central pools at two tundra lakes show lake regime responses to climate variation. Annual mean temperatures have varied in 2000-17 between -5.7 and 2.8 Celsius (°C) for shallow terraces and 1.1 and 4.5 °C for deep pools, and between -11.5 and -8.4 °C in the air. R^2 for thawing degree-days at lake-bottom and in the air ranged between 0.83 and 0.91 at shallow sites, and up to 0.85 for deep sites. Using the four warmest and coldest years as an analogue for climate change - an adjustment that may occur this century - talik geometry may take millennia to reach equilibrium. These data are included in a proceedings paper under the same title and authors for the 2021 Regional Conference on Permafrost in Boulder, Colorado.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCalifornia Digital LibrarySame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207