Bibliographic record
Abstract
The softwarization and virtualization of the fifth-generation (5G) cellular networks bring about increased flexibility and faster deployment of new services. However, these advancements also introduce new vulnerabilities and unprecedented attack surfaces. The cloud-native nature of 5G networks mandates detecting and protecting against threats and intrusions in the cloud systems. Additionally, the evolving cyber-threat landscape and the growing reliance on cellular networks for mission-critical tasks reinforce the need for robust security systems, which should be capable of detecting stealthy and zero-day attacks. Recent developments in Provenance-based Intrusion Detection Systems (PIDS) address these requirements. These host-based systems aim to analyze provenance graphs derived from system calls to uncover any deviation from the expected benign behaviour of the host. Provenance graphs are structured as holistic representations of the dependencies and causal relationships between digital objects, and hence they fit well in the Service-based Architecture (SBA) of 5G networks. However, deploying PIDS requires substantial datasets of provenance graphs collected from the relevant hosts. In this work, we propose a framework to generate provenance graphs datasets for a 5G core network. We provide an example dataset and evaluate the state-of-the-art PIDS in protecting a 5G network core from various threats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.064 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".