MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6944942480 · doi:10.20381/ruor-13768

A proposal for surveillance and case registry of schizophrenia in Ontario

2011· article· en· W6944942480 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCensus and Population Estimation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Mental illnessMental healthDiagnosis of schizophreniaPsychosisHospital dischargeMEDLINEPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schizophrenia is an illness causing impairment in thinking and functioning in many realms of everyday life. It is considered one of the most disabling of mental illnesses. This thesis considers the impact of schizophrenia in Ontario, including elevated mortality, degree of disability, economic impact. Some known risk factors for schizophrenia are increasingly common in Ontario, such as urban exposure, and a history of immigration. The impact of the illness in Ontario makes schizophrenia a good candidate for surveillance and case registry in this province. This thesis reviews the required elements of a surveillance system, including case definition and potential data sources and applies them to surveillance of schizophrenia in Ontario. The thesis then proposes a surveillance system and linked case registry based on combined OHIP, discharge abstract and mental health care administrative data, and outlines the necessary steps in implementation and evaluation of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicCensus and Population EstimationFrench-language works237,207