MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6945014928 · doi:10.24433/co.1524092.v2

YRT-PET: An Open-Source GPU-accelerated Image Reconstruction Engine for Positron Emission Tomography

2025· other· en· W6945014928 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCode Ocean · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIterative reconstructionScannerSoftwarePython (programming language)Image qualityPositron emission tomographyAutomationImage resolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Github: https://github.com/YaleBioImaging/yrt-pet Read the Docs: https://yrt-pet.readthedocs.io/ Image reconstruction for positron emission tomography (PET) is typically implemented by manufacturers, specifically for a given family of scanners, which limits the ability to perform direct comparisons between scanners, and to develop scanner-agnostic image reconstruction algorithms. Open-source image reconstruction software can offer an alternative to manufacturer implementations, allowing more control and portability. Several existing software packages offer a wide range of features and interfaces, but there is still a need for an engine that simultaneously offers reusable code, fast implementation and convenient interfaces for interoperability and extensibility. In this work, we introduce YRT-PET (Yale Reconstruction Toolkit for Positron Emission Tomography), an open-source toolkit for PET image reconstruction that aims for flexibility, reproducibility, speed, and interoperability with existing research software. The toolkit is implemented in C++ with CUDA-enabled GPU acceleration and Python bindings. It includes support for list-mode/histogram data formats, multiple PET projectors, incorporation of time-of-flight information, event-by-event rigid motion correction, point-spread function modeling, normalization correction, and corrections for degrading factors such as randoms and scatter. To evaluate the capabilities of the software, two different scanners in four different contexts were tested: dynamic imaging, motion correction, deep image prior, and reconstruction for a limited-angle scanner geometry with time-of-flight. Comparisons with existing tools demonstrated good agreement in image quality and the effectiveness of the correction methods. The proposed software toolkit offers high versatility and potential for research, including the development of novel reconstruction algorithms and new PET scanner systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCode OceanSame topicHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchFrench-language works237,207