MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6945146097 · doi:10.2478/auom-2025-0014

On residuated <i>n</i> -lattice

2025· article· en· W6945146097 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalele Universităţii "Ovidius" Constanţa. Seria Matematică · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicFuzzy and Soft Set Theory
Canadian institutionsEtobicoke General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemigroupVariety (cybernetics)Residuated latticeState (computer science)Class (philosophy)Monoidal t-norm logic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we introduce residuated n-lattice: a variety of residuated semigroup equipped with binary hyperoperations n-sup and n-inf. We define the left bound, right bound, n-supremum, n-infimum, maximum and minimum with respect to it′s relation. By these way, the notion of residuated semigroup has been generalized. Some examples of residuated n-lattice have been gave, then we show that our definition is an extention of the old ones. Also, we state and prove some theorems in this structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it