MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6945147418 · doi:10.24433/co.7293337.v1

Cosserat Rod-based Dynamic Modeling of Tendon-Driven Continuum Robots

2021· other· en· W6945147418 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueCode Ocean · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMATLABCode (set theory)RobotAutomationSource codeCode generationProgram code

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a MATLAB code using for the dynamic modeling of Cosserat-Rod based tendon-driven continuum robots. The code has been developed in Robotics, Mechatronics, and Automation Laboratory (RMAL) at Ryerson University. This code is distributed under the MIT license, and could be used, modified, and distributed for non-commercial purposes. The authors of the code and the paper are not liable to any damage caused by using this code. Please refer if you use this code. Dependencies: MATLAB 2019a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCode OceanSame topicStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207