MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6945160708 · doi:10.22054/jims.2023.70278.2815

Designing a closed-loop supply chain multi-objective optimization model with the aim of supplier selection and order allocation (case study: Iran's retail stores for protein products)

2023· article· en· W6945160708 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainProfit (economics)Supplier relationship managementFuzzy logicSupply chain risk managementOrder (exchange)Supply chain managementProduct (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In today's competitive business landscape, the efficient management of supply chains has become a cornerstone of success for economic enterprises. Supplier selection, as the initial link in the supply chain, holds significant sway over various critical factors, such as product quality, return rates, and production costs. However, the real world is rife with uncertainties, making the application of a fuzzy approach highly advisable. This study's primary objective is to develop a model for supplier selection and order quantity determination for perishable protein products in a retail setting under uncertain conditions. Initially, a comprehensive fuzzy multi-objective model is designed for Kourosh Protein, a company in the closed-loop supply chain, aiming to minimize costs, waste, and maximize profit, customer satisfaction, quality, and profit margin in the face of uncertainty. Subsequently, this full-fledged fuzzy multi-objective model is transformed into a deterministic single-objective model using the Sharma and Agarwal method (2018), yielding optimal order quantities from each supplier. The model's practical implementation in an Iranian retail store for protein products, such as sausages, bologna, hamburgers, etc., demonstrates its potential to reduce costs and boost profits.IntroductionThe global population's rapid expansion and shifts in lifestyle have significantly elevated the food sector's importance in the global economy, specifically in Sustainable Food Supply Chain Management (SFSCM). SFSCM plays a pivotal role in balancing economic, social, and environmental criteria to optimize supply chain performance. Within the complex food supply chain, suppliers wield considerable influence due to their impact on product attributes, safety, quality, and perishability. Supplier selection, a critical facet of SFSCM, substantially affects a company's strategic and operational performance, product pricing, and quality. In this context, this research introduces a fully fuzzy multi-objective model (FFMOP) to enhance the sustainable supply chain performance of a retail company's protein products. Given the inherent uncertainties associated with supplier selection, the proposed model incorporates an extensive array of variables to simulate real-world scenarios. This innovative approach aims to address identified gaps in existing literature, providing a more robust and realistic tool for bolstering supply chain sustainability.Materials and MethodsThis study constructs a full fuzzy multi-objective model with the objective of determining optimal order quantities within the food supply chain while integrating sustainability criteria. The analyzed supply chain network encompasses multiple suppliers, a single retailer, and end consumers, characterized by multi-product and multi-level interactions. The model seeks to optimize profit, customer satisfaction, brand acceptance, quality, profit margin, and minimize waste production while determining the optimal order volume for each product from each supplier. Reviewing the existing literature reveals various approaches to tackle Full Fuzzy Multi-Objective Problems. This research employs the methodology proposed by Sharma & Aggarwal in 2018 to solve the FFMOP model. After defuzzification, the final model is solved using GAMS software to determine the optimal values of decision variables.ResultsThis research utilizes a case study of an Iranian retail company with eight main suppliers providing 15 protein food products. However, the focus is primarily on four key products: sausages, bologna, hamburgers, and pizza cheese, which are examined. Data for the study was collected from historical company records and interviews with experts from June 2021 to 2022. Model parameters are defined using trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. A comparison of optimal order quantities with the company's actual orders and sales reveals that the proposed model for order allocation leads to reduced ordering, maintenance, and procurement costs for the company. Additionally, the model mitigates waste resulting from unsold products.ConclusionSupplier selection stands as a pivotal process in an effective supply chain, exerting substantial influence on a company's strategic outcomes and performance metrics. This study employs a full fuzzy multi-objective model to identify the most suitable supplier and determine optimal orders within a sustainable food supply chain context. To better mimic real-world conditions, variables and parameters are treated as trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. A comparison of the model's outputs with actual sales data indicates that this methodology aligns more accurately with sales figures. Consequently, applying this model has the potential to reduce waste production and economic consequences. The study's achievement lies in selecting a supplier through a methodology that simultaneously considers sustainability criteria within a fully fuzzy environment while determining optimal order quantities from various suppliers. Moreover, the model's flexibility allows for its application across diverse industries, including dairy and dried fruit, for procuring and selling an array of products from potential suppliers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207