Neurodegeneration and humoral response proteins in cerebrospinal fluid associate with pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis and not monophasic demyelinating syndromes in childhood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background:Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) represents the earliest stage of disease pathogenesis. Investigating the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteome in POMS may provide novel insights into early MS processes.Objective:To analyze CSF obtained from children at time of initial central nervous system (CNS) acquired demyelinating syndrome (ADS), to compare CSF proteome of those subsequently ascertained as having POMS versus monophasic acquired demyelinating syndrome (mADS).Methods:Patients were selected from two prospective pediatric ADS studies. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was performed in a Dutch discovery cohort (POMS <i>n</i> = 28; mADS <i>n</i> = 39). Parallel reaction monitoring–mass spectrometry (PRM-MS) was performed on selected proteins more abundant in POMS in a combined Dutch and Canadian validation cohort (POMS <i>n</i> = 48; mADS <i>n</i> = 106).Results:Discovery identified 5580 peptides belonging to 576 proteins; 58 proteins were differentially abundant with ⩾2 peptides between POMS and mADS, of which 28 more abundant in POMS. Fourteen had increased abundance in POMS with ⩾8 unique peptides. Five selected proteins were all confirmed within validation. Adjusted for age, 2 out of 5 proteins remained more abundant in POMS, that is, <i>Carboxypeptidase E (CPE)</i> and <i>Semaphorin-7A (SEMA7A)</i>.Conclusion:This exploratory study identified several CSF proteins associated with POMS and not mADS, potentially reflecting neurodegeneration, compensatory neuroprotection, and humoral response in POMS. The proteins associated with POMS highly correlated with age at CSF sampling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".