MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6945259637 · doi:10.23658/taltech.32/2024

The Space-Cyber Nexus: Ensuring the Resilience, Security and Defence of Critical Infrastructure

2024· dissertation· en· W6945259637 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyEuropean CommissionEuropean Space AgencyCanadian Institute of Steel Construction
KeywordsCritical infrastructureGovernment (linguistics)Vulnerability (computing)Resilience (materials science)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article I describes outer space as a complex and strategic sector that involves various interests and actors and has a legal framework that is not well-defined or updated.The Article examines the legal and political aspects of using satellite capabilities in CI to understand the consequences and facilitate the development of recommendations.The Article addresses the potential impact of a cyber event on space assets and interconnected national and international CI.This Article summarises the main points of the conception of space systems as CI, which therefore requires inclusion in relevant protection frameworks and paradigms: Building resilient protection policies is key to recognising space systems as CI.Article II, an analysis of cyber security risks and vulnerabilities, was conducted to facilitate future artificial intelligence use in space security.The paper also examines how a network of digital twins can effectively defend against constant cyber attacks in space, which target users and ground segments.To address these issues, the Article defines cyber security risks and vulnerabilities in space and evaluates the potential of simulating a network digital twin to prevent and counter cyber attacks on space and ground segments.To achieve this, the paper focuses on the case study of Earth observation (EO) operations, which are particularly sensitive to the reputational, environmental, and social impacts of malicious cyber activity.Article III addresses hostile cyber operations, reconstructing their nature and characteristics to understand how they can influence space systems.It is vital to characterise space cyber threats to design and create protective measures to boost the cyber resilience of space assets.To achieve this, the paper reconstructs possible incident responses, analysing the ICT governance frameworks and strategies, technical strategies, and applying and enforcing the applicable laws given the related minimum requirements for risk mitigations (the Notion of Prudent and Reasonable Actor) as insurance aspects.The article analyses the relationship between the cyber legal framework and outer space with an in-depth analysis of the legal and political responses in state-to-state cyber relations.Article IV addresses the legal and technical challenges to ensure the cyber security of mega-constellations and possible solutions and assets to minimise risks by applying specific policies and techniques permitted (or required by) technological progress.Megaconstellations are a relatively new phenomenon in the space industry, involving thousands of small satellites in low Earth orbit that provide global communications services.Small satellites typically have a small mass and use commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components for their electronics and structure.For instance, Estonia's EST CUBE was the first of its kind to attempt the use of an electric solar wind sail (E-sail) and had a mass of 1kg.These mega-constellations present challenges for cyber security, as they can be vulnerable to various types of cyber attacks, such as jamming, spoofing, hacking, or cyber sabotage.These attacks can have serious consequences not only for the services provided by mega-constellations but also for the security of space and the sustainability of the orbital environment.For this reason, it is essential to adopt adequate cyber security measures for mega-constellations, including both technical and regulatory aspects.The Article hence analyses the concept of cyber security for mega-constellations, examining the main risks and possible solutions, both at the individual satellite and network level, to propose some policy recommendations to promote greater cooperation and coordination between space actors involved in mega-constellations.Article V maps the landscape of cyber and space law, particularly concerning their nexus: The Article examines and discusses the legal and political implications of the rela- Results and Associated PublicationsArticle III presents the results of action-oriented research.This project was carried out in partnership with the Cyber and Space Working Group of the Space Generation Advisory Council (SGAC).The research project sought to analyse the impact of hostile cyber operations on space activities, from their inception to their consequences.The Article also assesses the current and future possibilities of coordinating information security policies of satellite communication systems.It highlights that protecting a satellite system from cyber threats is a complex task that requires a joint effort from all stakeholders, whether from the public or private sector, and involves addressing both technical and legal aspects.Thus, as the threats continue to evolve, keeping the system secure has become increasingly challenging.This Article is closely connected to Articles IV and V, as it makes use of their policy and legal findings to provide a comprehensive understanding of the nexus.Article IV is an exploratory investigation into the legal and technical issues surrounding the cyber security protection of satellite mega-constellations and the policy changes and technological improvements that can mitigate these threats.To be able to recommend valid and concrete dynamics and assets, the study included extensive consultation between governmental and non-governmental actors.The Article argues that it is essential to establish consistent and comprehensive criteria to ensure the security and reliability of space systems, especially in the face of low-level threats.The ITU recommendations must be scrupulously respected by national authorities, especially as poor regulation can result in some private entities avoiding the process and generating dangers in orbit.The Article concludes that it is thus necessary to identify and follow the good practices of national structures or bodies, develop a guideline for future missions, and define a legal framework for space activities involving mega-constellations.Article V explores the legal and political implications of the intersection between outer space and EDTs, paying particular attention to space operations involving military and civil international journal of critical infrastructure protection 45 (2024) 100680

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→