MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6945315088 · doi:10.24411/2411-0450-2020-10400

ОСОБЕННОСТИ РАЗВИТИЯ КАЛУЖСКОГО ФАРМАЦЕВТИЧЕСКОГО КЛАСТЕРА В УСЛОВИЯХ ВНЕШНИХ ВЫЗОВОВ: ПАНДЕМИЯ КОРОНАВИРУСА

2020· article· ru· W6945315088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCyberLeninK (CyberLeninka) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislaturePandemicQuarter (Canadian coin)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Coronavirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Одним из важнейших факторов развития внешнеторговой деятельности Калужской области является фармацевтический кластер. В статье описано влияние пандемии коронавируса на социально-экономическое развитие фармкластера в 1 квартале 2020 года включающая в себя: внесение нормативных поправок в законодательную базу в связи с пандемией, переход торговли в онлайн режим, статистические данные экспорта и импорта за 1 квартал, а также изменения в маркировке фармпродукции.One of the most important factors in the development of Kaluga region's foreign trade activity is the pharmaceutical cluster. The article describes the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the socio-economic development of the pharmaceutical cluster in the 1st quarter of 2020, including: regulatory amendments to the legislative framework in connection with the pandemic, the transition of trade to online mode, export and import statistics for the 1st quarter, as well as changes in the labeling of pharmaceutical products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCyberLeninK (CyberLeninka)Same topicHistorical, Literary, and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207