MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6945366480 · doi:10.25318/1310094301-eng

Barriers to accessibility encountered by persons with disabilities or long-term conditions related to support services for television or mobile or smartphone, aged 15 years and over, Canada, 2024

2025· dataset· en· W6945366480 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics Canada Dissemination · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile deviceAssistive technologyQuality of life (healthcare)Health services

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Differences in the number and proportions of persons with disabilities or long-term conditions aged 15 years and over in Canada who experienced at least one type of barriers to accessibility related to support services for television or mobile or smartphone because of their condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics Canada DisseminationSame topicTraditional Chinese Medicine AnalysisFrench-language works237,207