Separação Entre Propriedade e Decisão de Gestão nas Cooperativas Agropecuárias Brasileiras
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A visão predominante na teoria econômica é que organizações de propriedade difusa e complexas apresentam melhor desempenho se forem separados os direitos ao lucro residual das decisões de gestão. Nos países de economia desenvolvida, os modelos de governança corporativa das cooperativas agropecuárias de propriedade difusa e complexas, tal como já informado pela literatura econômica, promovem a desvinculação dos cooperados da gestão da empresa. Em contraposição, no Brasil, embora não haja estudos sistemáticos sobre o tema, evidências pontuais indicam que essas organizações concentram a propriedade e decisões de gestão. A possível divergência entre os modelos de governança utilizados nos diferentes países revela a necessidade de mensuração do grau de separação entre propriedade e decisão de gestão em cooperativas agropecuárias brasileiras, tarefa a que se dedica este artigo. A partir de dados coletados junto a 77 cooperativas agropecuárias, identificou-se que diferentes modelos de governança coexistem no Brasil. Embora grande parcela de cooperativas tenha governança concentrada, há um grupo que já adota modelos de governança que promovem a separação parcial de jure ou de facto entre propriedade e decisão de gestão. Esses resultados revelam a necessidade de pesquisas futuras voltadas a identificar os determinantes da variabilidade de modelos de governança nas cooperativas brasileiras.....Contract and Organizational theories establish that complex organizations with diffuse ownership, such as agriculture cooperatives, should benefit from the separation of ownership and decision control. In developed economies, such as the USA and Canada, these organizations, aligned with the theoretical proposition, adopt governance models that promote the separation of ownership and decision rights. However, in Brazil, despite the lack ofquantitative studies that measure governance separation, anecdotal evidence suggests that ownership and decisions rights are concentrated in Brazilian cooperatives. By means of a survey with 77 Brazilian agricultural cooperatives, this paper measures the degree of de jure and de facto separation of ownership and decision control, providing new evidences on the governance models observed in different countries. Different models coexist in Brazil, i.e., although the majority of agricultural cooperatives concentrate ownership and decision rights, a significant proportion organize themselves consistently with the theoretical proposition, adopting the American models of agricultural cooperatives. Further research is required in order to address the determinants of the variety of governance models in Brazil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".