Pro football -- Los Angeles Rams vs. Washington, 1960
Bibliographic record
Abstract
19 images. Pro football -- Los Angeles Rams vs. Washington, 19 August 1960.; Caption slip reads: "Photographer: Rustan. Date: 1960-08-19. Assignment: Rams -- Redskins. First quarter. 53: 33 rams short gain. 54: 33 Rams returns ball 56 yards. 55: 5 yard line puts rams back 5. 62: 1st Rams field goal. 27: Washington 19 pass to 81 complete. 28: Washington 81 received pass. Second quarter -- 49: Washington 20 down to 1 yard line. 50: Washington stopped on 2 ft. line. 82: Washington scores TD. 45: 20 Washington injured on kick off play. 46: Ram Field Goal N.G. 51: 42 Washington over for 2nd T.D. Develop 7 minutes. 3rd quarter: 91: 3 Rams field goal. 4th quarter: 92: Villanouva, Rams, kicks long field goal (46 yards). This was his 4th for evening".; Additional caption slip reads: "Photographer: Jensen. Date: 1960-08-19. Assignment: Rams vs. Redskins. 1 quarter. 68: 33 Rams returns 1st kickoff to 27 yd. line. 69: Arnett catches pass on 37 yard line. Made 21 yards. 98: 10 Rams pulled down by 86 Washington on 4 yard line. 99: 1st Rams score field goal from 8 yard line. 102: 20 Washington takes pass hit on 3 yard line by 57 and 76 Rams, 1st down".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.755 | 0.529 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".