MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6945493722 · doi:10.25384/sage.21130625.v1

sj-pdf-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163221122326 – Supplemental material for Paracentesis for cancer-related ascites in palliative care: An international, prospective cohort study

2022· article· en· W6945493722 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAscitesProspective cohort studyParacentesisPalliative careCohort studyCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163221122326 for Paracentesis for cancer-related ascites in palliative care: An international, prospective cohort study by Davinia SE Seah, Andrew Wilcock, Sungwon Chang, Mariana S Sousa, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Cy Oun Teoh, Simon Allan, Richard Chye, Matthew Doogue, Jane Hunt, Meera Agar and David C Currow in Palliative Medicine

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.008
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1360.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207