MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6945515418 · doi:10.25384/sage.24903866

sj-docx-1-cjk-10.1177_20543581231217853 – Supplemental material for Volume Status Assessment by Lung Ultrasound in End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

2023· article· en· W6945515418 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSage Journals Data · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicHops Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltrasoundKidneyKidney diseaseLungLung ultrasoundVolume (thermodynamics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-cjk-10.1177_20543581231217853 for Volume Status Assessment by Lung Ultrasound in End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review by Aileen Kharat, Faissal Tallaa, Marc-Antoine Lepage, Emilie Trinh, Rita S. Suri and Thomas A. Mavrakanas in Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0080.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8790.169

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSage Journals DataSame topicHops Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207