Convention at Chapman Park Hotel, Los Angeles, Calif., 1942
Bibliographic record
Abstract
183 photographs of men's clothing being modeled: surrounding the swimming pool is an audience as if the walkways beside the pool were a fashion runway, Los Angeles, California, 1942 July 14. Occasionally individual women and boys accompany the male models when matching clothes are involved, and there are photographs of lunch service, crowds, and individual crowd members from individuals through groups. "Client: Mens Wear Association; Agency: Phil Lansdale; charge only for 178 neg[ative]s @ 2.75 & extra 8x10 glossy of ea[ch]; Amount: $300.00; priced originally at 2.75 ea[ch], incl[uding] an extra 8x10 print, on acc[coun]t poor photos, sp[e]c[ia]l price was charged" - on envelopes. "Apparel for Morale, Los Angeles Men's Fall Apparel Show, Chapman Park Hotel, Los Angeles, Tuesday, July 14th, 1942, Market Week, July 15 to 18, inclusive; Presented by Men's Wear Manufacturers of Los Angeles; The models (in order of their appearance): Lee Bennett, Billy Wilkerson, Jim Ball, Alan Baldwin, Fred Beckner, Allen Keith,Don McGill, Shep Houghton" - on program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.352 | 0.042 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".