Sensibilisation et mise en valeur de la faune aviaire précaire de la Zone importante pour la conservation des oiseaux (ZICO) de la Baie des Sept-Îles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le projet ZICO phase II visait à faire valoir, d’une manière plus concrète, la richesse et l’importance de la Zone importante pour la conservation des oiseaux (ZICO) de Sept-Îles, et à faire la promotion de la conservation des habitats essentiels pour la faune aviaire. Le moyen choisi pour atteindre ces objectifs est d’élaborer des activités et des outils visant la sensibilisation des décideurs, de la population locale et des visiteurs. Le projet comportait deux volets, soit un volet de sensibilisation ainsi qu’un volet de mise en valeur. Ces volets se sont déclinés en deux activités principales : I- la Journée des décideurs et II- la Route des oiseaux. La première activité eut pour objectif la sensibilisation des acteurs politiques et économiques locaux, tandis que la seconde consista en la mise en valeur de la ZICO de Sept-Îles pour la population en général. Le projet s’est conclu en juin de l’année 2013.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".