MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6946451082 · doi:10.34820/fk2/e3ypdt

Effect Of Tax Income, Exchange Rate, Tunneling Incentive And Multinationality On Transfer Pricing Decisions

2023· dataset· en· W6946451082 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTelkom University · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFlavonoids in Medical Research
Canadian institutionsKelowna General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfer pricingIncentiveStock exchangeVariable pricingTransfer (computing)Panel dataVariable (mathematics)Exchange rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The-price agreed upon for the transfer of goods, services, or intangible assets between two businesses with a unique relationship based on the principles of fairness and prevalence is known as transfer pricing. Companies in the consumer goods category that list on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) between 2017 and 2021 make up the study's population. Samples result were 8 companies with a research period of 5 years and this study get 40 observation data. The study's findings demonstrate that tax income and tunneling incentive have a negative effect on transfer pricing decisions. Decisions regarding transfer pricing are unaffected by exchange rate and multinationality. Variable tax income, exchange rate, tunneling incentive, and multinationality have simultaneously effect on transfer pricing decisions. Future researchers who desire to conduct transfer pricing-related research can use this study as a guide. To acquire more data and improve the results of statistical tests and panel data regression tests, it is suggested that the research object be expanded and that additional years of research be added.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it