MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6947730829 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0314.116

A Comparative Study of Difficult-To-Treat Vs Non-Difficult-To-Treat Psoriatic Arthritis for Disease Burden and Comorbidities: An Ultrasound Study

2025· article· en· W6947730829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEnvironmental Monitoring and Data Management
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthesitisPsoriatic arthritisSynovitisRheumatoid arthritisEnthesisRheumatologyDactylitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives In the era of several advanced therapies and an increased number of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have been failed by multiple treatment options, a better understanding of Difficult-to-Treat (D2T) PsA is essential and timely. In this analysis, we aimed to explore the D2T PsA patient phenotype, by comparing the clinical features, comorbidities, and ultrasonographic features of peripheral arthritis and enthesitis domains with non-DT2 PsA, to understand factors contributing to the D2T state. Methods Patients were recruited from the ORCHESTRA (Ottawa Rheumatology CompreHEnSive Treatment and Assessment) Clinic, where all patients with inflammatory arthritis who are about to initiate a new advanced therapy are assessed using a standardized protocol including disease features, medications, comorbidities, and clinical disease activity measures. A protocoled ultrasound (US) was performed including 44 joints for synovitis and 14 entheses for enthesitis. Synovitis was scored using the Global OMERACT-EULAR Synovitis Score (GLOESS). Elementary lesions of enthesitis included hypoechogenicity, thickening, and power Doppler signals (features of inflammation) and erosions, calcifications, and enthesophytes (features of damage), all being on a scale of 0-3 (none-mild-moderate-severe). Relevant features were summed to reach inflammation, damage, and total enthesitis scores per patient. For this analysis, D2T PsA definitions were extrapolated from the EULAR definition of D2T Rheumatoid Arthritis.[1] Patients who fulfilled the D2T PsA definition were compared with the patients who did not fulfill (non-D2T). Results Among 52 PsA patients, 16 (30.8%) fulfilled the definition of D2T PsA. Demographics were similar between the 2 groups, except the male sex being numerically higher in D2T PsA patients (n=10/16 (62.5%) vs n=13/36 (36.1%); p=0.077) and having longer disease duration (Table 1). Disease activities were similar between groups, both clinically and in the US, and CRP levels were even lower in D2T PsA patients (p=0.022). Gout and inflammatory bowel disease were statistically higher in D2T PsA patients than non-D2T group (Table 1). Table 1. Comparison of Difficult-to-Treat Psoriatic Arthritis with Non-Difficult-to-Treat Psoriatic Arthritis patients Conclusion There were no clinical and ultrasonographic differences in peripheral arthritis and enthesitis domains between patients with D2T and non-D2T PsA. In our patient population, comorbidities, gout, and inflammatory bowel disease seem to be associated with D2T state, but not necessarily a higher disease burden. [1.] Nagy G. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:31-5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it