MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6947760672 · doi:10.4224/21263082

A direct polynomial regression for PMM data analysis and application

2012· report· en· W6947760672 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2012
Typereport
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical synthesis and alkaloids
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaGovernment of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRudderSet (abstract data type)PolynomialVariable (mathematics)Regression analysisData setHarmonic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report describes the principle and development of a Multiple Variables Polynomia Regression program, and demonstrates an application of the program in PMM data analysis. A new PMM test, dynamic rudder test has also been described and suggested as a substitution of static rudder tests. A criteria ( δ˙< 0.4 ) is recommended as a guidline in conducting the dynamic rudder test. A new PMM test design suggested in the present study cuts a set PMM tests from tens carriage runs to four carriage runs only. The four carriage runs are a dynamic rudder, a harmonic sway, a harmonic yaw, and a combined run. Summaries on the present study and suggestions for future improvements have also been provided in this report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicChemical synthesis and alkaloidsFrench-language works237,207