MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6947846336 · doi:10.4224/crm.2021.cled-1

CLED-1: Lead-206 and lead-208 double spike isotopic standard

2021· other· en· W6947846336 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueNRC Digital Repository · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotopeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Nitric acidMixing (physics)Atomic massStable isotope ratioStandard solutionLead (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CLED-1 is a high purity isotopic lead Certified Reference Material (CRM). A unit of CLED-1 consists of 1 mL lead solution at 100 mg/kg in 2 % nitric acid that was prepared by mixing separated lead isotope materials to obtain approximately 2:3 ratio of lead-206 and lead-208. This material is intended as an isotopic standard of lead. Certified values for the isotopic composition and the atomic weight of lead have been established for this CRM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNRC Digital RepositorySame topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207