Współpraca służb wywiadowczych PRL i Związku Sowieckiego jako element relacji dwustronnych KGB z MSW (1956–1990)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Throughout the communist period, the security authorities in Poland were under the influence and supervision of the Soviet Union. At the beginning of 1957, it was agreed to set up a KGB Liaison Group in Warsaw, which, from the early 1970s, was called the KGB Representation to the Interior Ministry of the Polish People’s Republic. Its task was to coordinate cooperation between the security authorities of the two countries. The course of interaction between the Ministry of the Interior and the KGB was established during bilateral meetings, which took place alternately in Warsaw and Moscow. Periodic conferences of the intelligence services of the bloc socialist countries were also convened on the initiative of the Soviet side. After 1956, despite the change in the political situation, the Soviet services continued to exert influence on the direction of the activities taken by the Ministry of the Interior. One of the most important areas of cooperation was in intelligence activities. The Department I of the Ministry of the Interior cooperated with the First Main Directorate of the KGB in many fields. The basis of cooperation was the exchange of operational data, information and certain obtained documents. These mainly concerned political and economic subjects. Scientific and technical intelligence as well as so-called active operations were also important areas of cooperation. The security authorities of the Polish People’s Republic were not treated as an equal partner by the KGB. Very often they were forced to give more than they received in return. Cooperation with Soviet intelligence ceased in the first quarter of 1990 as a result of the change in the state’s foreign policy directions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".