MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6947856864 · doi:10.4224/21263083

Modeling and simulation of ship manoeuvring with Azimuthing Podded Propulsion Systems: a summary report

2012· report· en· W6947856864 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2012
Typereport
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersMemorial University of NewfoundlandGovernment of CanadaTransport Canada
KeywordsPropulsionWork (physics)Modeling and simulationMarine propulsionJet propulsionNumerical modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report summarizes the results obtained in the three-year collaborative project between the NRC’s Ocean, Coastal and River Engineering (NRC-OCRE, formerly the Institute for Ocean Technology), the Memorial University of Newfoundland’s Centre for Marine Simulation (CMS) and the Korean Maritime and Ocean Engineering Research Institute (MOERI) under its “Modeling and Simulation of Ship Maneuvering with Azimuthing Podded Propulsion Systems Project.” The project is funded by Transport Canada of the Government of Canada through its Marine Safety Program. The work elements are described and the important results are highlighted. This report also provides a brief summary of the accompanying reports and papers generated for this project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207