MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6947892230 · doi:10.4224/21274849

Conseil national de recherches du Canada : vérification des frais d'accueil pour l'exercice 2007-2008 : vérification interne, CNRC

2009· report· fr· W6947892230 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaPrivy Council Office
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)LegislationPublic healthPoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le présent rapport présente les constatations tirées de la vérification de conformité annuelle des frais d'accueil pour l'exercice 2007-2008 du Conseil national de recherches du Canada (CNRC). La décision de mener cette vérification a été approuvée par le président le 27 juin 2007, sur la recommandation du Comité de la vérification, de l'évaluation et de la gestion des risques, dans le cadre du plan de vérification interne axé sur les risques pour 2007-2008 à 2009-2010 du CNRC. En 2007-2008, les frais d'accueil se sont chiffrés à 1,5 million de dollars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.057
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207