MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6947955269 · doi:10.4224/40003115

Stochastic simulation of building envelope performance: methodology and implementation

2022· report· en· W6947955269 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2022
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuilding envelopeBuilding designDurabilityEnvelope (radar)Resilience (materials science)Built environmentBuilding scienceEnergy performanceZero-energy building

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well recognized that climate changes will have an impact on building performance in different aspects, such as the performance with respect to whole building energy consumption, to indoor thermal comfort as well as to the hygrothermal performance of building envelope. Climate-resilient building design has become crucial for constructing new buildings or rehabilitating existing buildings when adapting to the changing climate. NRC Construction Research Centre has carried out a Climate-Resilient Built Environment (CRBE) project: “Decision Support Tools for Building Envelope Performance Assessment” (2021-2026), intended as means to develop decision support tools, including guides and models for the design of resilient new buildings, and the rehabilitation of existing buildings to ensure that existing and future climate loads and extreme weather events are considered. To achieve these goals, the NBC Part 9 walls will be investigated through hygrothermal simulation and stochastic simulation to take the uncertainties of climate change into consideration. In the CRBCPI project carried in the past five years (2016-2021), an extensive set of hygrothermal simulations were carried out to evaluate the mould growth performance of different types of wood-frame building envelopes under historical and future climatic conditions across a number of major cities in Canada. The hygrothermal simulations were performed by following the approach described in Guideline on Design for Durability of Building Envelopes1, and the simulation results were presented in the report Results from Hygrothermal Simulations and on Durability and Resilience of Wall Assemblies to Climate Change2. To consider the uncertainties of the input parameters, such as the material properties, rain water penetration moisture loads and cladding ventilation rates, stochastic simulations need to be performed in the CRBE project (2021-2026). The stochastic simulation procedure should be generalized, and the generalized procedure can be applied to the CRBE project related to hygrothermal performance analysis and moisture damage risk assessment of building envelopes. The information provided in this report describes the process of rationalisation of the procedure used for hygrothermal performance analysis and probabilistic risk assessment of moisture related damage of building envelopes using stochastic simulation. It is intended for use by expert practitioners who have knowledge of hygrothermal simulation, and require hygrothermal performance results to assess climate resilient building envelope design, considering the uncertainties in input parameters. A complete stochastic simulation procedure requires the following steps: • The quantification of stochastic variables • Applying proper sampling techniques to generate stochastic models • Implementing stochastic simulations • Data visualization of stochastic results Generally, the stochastic simulation needs to be implemented in a third-party programming environment, in which a hygrothermal simulation engine can be called, and the stochastic models with randomly assigned variables can be repeatedly launched. In this report, the hygrothermal simulations were executed using Delphin 5.9.6, a commercial hygrothermal simulation program. Python 3.4 software was used for generating probability distributions of stochastic variables, implementing advanced sampling techniques to generate stochastic models, launching stochastic simulations and visualizing the stochastic results. A typical 2x6-inch wood-frame wall was used to demonstrate the stochastic simulation procedure; the stochastic simulations were performed under the historical and future climatic conditions of Ottawa. Although the stochastic simulation framework was developed for the purpose of hygrothermal performance analysis and moisture damage risk assessment of building envelopes, this procedure can also be adapted for summer-time overheating risk assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→French-language works237,207→