MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6947966115 · doi:10.48336/mdha-yg40

Modeling and analysis of heat transfer in a four-season greenhouse using ANSYS Fluent CFD software

2025· article· en· W6947966115 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat exchangerGreenhouseHeat transferFluentRelative humidityAirflowSensible heatComputational fluid dynamicsHumidity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In multiseason greenhouses, heating and cooling systems account for a significant part of the total operating cost. To make greenhouses more efficient it is important to reduce their reliance on external sources of energy as well as to minimize the energy wasted when it is most available. To do this a ground to air heat transfer (GAHT) system is used to store excess heat available during the daytime into the ground where it can be recovered during the night when the temperature in the greenhouse decreases to sub optimum levels. In this work, the mixture multiphase model in ANSYS Fluent was used to model and analyze the flow and energy exchange of dry and humid air through a simple GAHT system during daytime and nighttime conditions. The analysis of the dry air at initially 35 °C showed that approximately 70 kJ of heat stored in the air was able to be transferred to the cold soil initially at 15 °C and that increasing the flow of the air caused the exchange in heat to occur faster. The analysis of air initially at 35 °C with 80% relative humidity was able to transfer between 400 and 450 kJ of energy to the ground initially at 15 °C. This exchange of heat occurred predominantly due to thermal contact between the air and the soil/GAHT system and through the latent heat of condensation resulting in approximately a factor of 6 increase in energy exchange compared to dry air. In the last part of this work, we simulated nighttime conditions where colder air initially at 5 °C with 50% relative humidity was forced to circulate in the GAHT system with the ground initially at 15 °C. The results showed that the ground was able to successful transfer energy to the air warming the latter to 16 °C. In this case the exchange of thermal energy was significantly less with heat being transferred from the ground to the air, from the latent heat of condensation to the ground, and finally from the thermal energy of the air back to the ground. The results of this work demonstrated great potential for using ANSYS Fluent to further study the design characteristics of GAHT systems in the hopes of increasing their efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207