MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948047220 · doi:10.48336/9aea-q877

Green chemistry and an ocean based biorefinery approach for the valorization of Newfoundland and Labrador snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) processing discards

2023· article· en· W6948047220 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscardsAquacultureBiorefinerySnowHazardous wasteAgricultureShellfishBioproducts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) is the most important commercial species to the NL fishery and NL's rural economy. According to industry stakeholders, it has replaced cod as "King". In 2020, the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador reported an export value of $648 million from annual landings averaging 30,000 t of snow crab. The NL snow crab industry generates ~30% waste each year (~10,000 t), which typically is landfilled or dumped at sea. These discards contain valuable bioproducts such as pigments, proteins, chitin, and lipids, which could be recovered for use in a wide range of fields from agriculture and aquaculture to biomedical. However, many of the processes used for snow crab valorization require hazardous chemical treatments, such as acids, bases, and flammable solvents, creating environmental concerns such as air and water pollution, and health and safety concerns. In addition, environmental requirements are becoming stricter, making traditional disposal options for crab processing discards more difficult and costly. To address these challenges, I evaluated a combined green chemistry-ocean based biorefinery approach for the valorization of NL's snow crab processing discards. Four research studies were conducted using a range of methods: semi-structured interviews, analysis of fisheries and aquaculture statistics, evaluation of raw material pre-treatment and collection methods, scientific studies to characterize and stabilize crab discards, as well as comparisons of chemically extracted vs "green" extracted crab bioproducts. (1) An inventory assessment of available marine feedstocks showed that crustaceans generate the largest wastes, which in 2015 could theoretically support regional by-product processing facilities on the Northern Peninsula, Northeast Coast, and Avalon Peninsula. (2) Characterization and stabilization studies showed that seasonality and pre-treatment method had the greatest impact on quality, and that crab by-products have unique intrinsic characteristics that influence quality. (3) Purity and safety of crab bioproducts were evaluated by measuring quantities of trace metal contaminants. Two metals of concern were identified: arsenic, which causes acute toxicity; and aluminum, which may be covertly toxic over time. (4) Sequential extraction of carotenoid pigments, pigmented protein powder, and chitin from crab processing by-products using vegetable oils, citric acid, proteases, and hydrogen peroxide to replace traditional organic (e.g., acetone, ethanol) and inorganic (e.g., HCl, NaOH) reagents was evaluated and demonstrated that these chemical reagents can be replaced with green alternatives. The findings from these studies were incorporated into a green chemistry-biorefinery model that, with optimizations, could be adopted by industry and the province to address current challenges related to snow crab waste disposal and valorization. The proposed model allows for the extraction of multiple higher value crab bioproducts that are produced using more environmentally friendly and potentially lower cost alternatives, to more traditional chemically intensive and expensive techniques. It is anticipated that this model will provide the groundwork for the development of a provincial crustacean waste disposal and by-product utilization strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207