Environmental satisfaction in open-plan environments: 4. Relationships between physical variables
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As part of a larger project concerning the design and operation of open plan offices, a field study was conducted to determine the effects of open-plan office design on the indoor environment and on occupant satisfaction with that environment. Measurements were made in nine buildings in six cities; six buildings were in Canada, and three in the US; three were federal buildings, two were provincial buildings, and four were private-sector (high-tech) buildings. A total of 779 employees and their workstations were included in the data set. During a workstation visit, research staff conducted detailed measurements of ventilation, temperature, noise, lighting, and descriptive characteristics of the workstation during a 10-minute period. At the same time, the occupant completed a 27-item questionnaire on a handheld computer concerning their satisfaction with the workplace. The satisfaction data are analysed in other project reports, this report is concerned only with relationships between the physical variables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.017 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it