MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948111191 · doi:10.48336/y7fg-rp74

Corrosion under insulation in-situ testing in marine environment

2023· article· en· W6948111191 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionPipeline transportPitting corrosionCrevice corrosionElectrochemical noiseMoistureCathodic protection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oil and gas pipelines in marine or coastal environments experience significant corrosion when moisture and chloride penetrate surface protections. There is lack of in-situ work studying corrosion under insulation (CUI) and corrosion under coating, especially in marine atmosphere. As well, monitoring and inspection of assets under corrosion attack is a concern, as it can spread insidiously in out of sight areas. Real time monitoring of pipelines and other assets is best to get information quickly, especially in difficult to reach areas. Electrochemical potential noise (EPN) is one proposed method to investigate CUI using simple equipment and should be further investigated in determining quantitative corrosion results. This thesis investigates corrosion and pitting from pipelines which were coated, uncoated, insulated, and not, in a marine harsh environment field experiment. The surface morphology, and mechanisms of corrosion were also studied. Thirty-six A333 low temperature carbon steel pipelines were placed at Argentia, NL, Canada, an extremely corrosive environment (C5) near shoreline. High humidity, winds, and sea-spray are present throughout most of the year. Corrosion rate was assessed using mass loss and optical inspections were used for pit depth. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscope were used to determine corrosion products and surface morphology. Corrosion near the ends of the pipe were most severe, perhaps due to crevice corrosion, and ingress of moisture and chloride. Insulated uncoated pipes showed deepest pits, therefore when pipes are insulated, anti-corrosion protective coating should be applied. Corrosion and pitting rates were lowest in insulated and coated pipes. Real time monitoring using EPN was explored, varying electrode size, temperature, and electrolytes. EPN was recorded using Keithly digital multimeter controlled by LabVIEW software. Potential was investigated using time and frequency domain methods to determine its usefulness in monitoring corrosion. In this research the best way to relate potential to mass loss and corrosion type occurred using time-frequency domain power spectral density from raw potential noise generated from electrodes. This in-situ testing enhanced the understanding of corrosion mechanisms and pitting in the environment. Important coating and insulation time to failure was recorded, which provides insights for oil and gas operations regarding inspection, maintenance, and design life. EPN tests proved a simple method and equipment can be used for in-situ corrosion detection, which can help ensure safety and asset integrity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it