MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948210355 · doi:10.48336/402v-9s58

From critical minerals to critical reclamation: Implementing an anticolonial ethics of reclamation for the Faro Mine, in Tsē Zūl, Dena Kēyeh (unceded Kaska Lands, Yukon, Canada)

2025· article· en· W6948210355 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicWood and Agarwood Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLand reclamationContext (archaeology)Stewardship (theology)Government (linguistics)SustainabilityWork (physics)General partnershipSettlement (finance)Participatory action research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the Canadian government renews promotions for so-called ‘critical minerals’ extraction across Northern Canada, local communities are grappling with both the legacies of abandoned sites and new articulations (or co-optations) of sustainability in the context of green energy. With this drive for increased mining, the need for nuanced discussions about reclamation are critical. The Faro Mine, a lead-zinc mine that operated from 1969-1999, is one of the largest reclamation sites in Canada. Located in Tsē Zūl, on unceded Tū Łídlīni (Ross River) Kaska Dena Land, the mine inflicted countless harms on the community and Dena Kēyeh (Dena Land). For decades Tū Łídlīni Dena have been demanding that both mining and reclamation be done differently, in a way that respects Kaska stewardship and governance. Through participatory action and placebased research, in partnership with Ross River Dena Council (RRDC), this PhD aims to re-think reclamation and unearth possibilities for ethical, community-driven approaches to repairing contaminated landscapes. Grounded in the direction and priorities of Tū Łídlīni Dena Elders, this research focuses first on analyzing the ‘infrastructures of theft’ at Faro, including the mineral permitting, welfare state policies, and water licensing that facilitated the theft of unceded Kaska Land and Water. I then trace how these historic mechanisms of theft have morphed into the contemporary impact assessment and regulatory processes guiding reclamation work at Faro. A second key priority for this community-based research was to build reclamation alternatives based in Kaska knowledge, drawing on the long history of Tū Łídlīni Dena resistance to the Faro Mine. Therefore, part of my work included supporting and documenting the implementation of a community-based revegetation program, centered in healing. While pointing to the root causes of violence and contamination at Faro, this research simultaneously celebrates all the relationships that have persisted, that are hard fought for in the face of pervasive racism, colonialism, and extractivism. This resistance is exemplified in the stories, experiences, community planning, and alternatives that have been articulated by Tū Łídlīni Dena for decades. These alternatives are what form the very basis of anti-colonial reclamation, and the imagining of future human-environment relationships based in Indigenous lands, community, and governance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicWood and Agarwood ResearchFrench-language works237,207