MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6948270675 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10469822

Lasiancistrus mayoloi Eigenmann 1912

2023· article· en· W6948270675 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnoutHolotypeDorsumOrbit (dynamics)Dorsal fin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasiancistrus mayoloi Eigenmann, 1912 (Fig. 8; Tables 4 and 5) Hemiancistrus mayoloi Eigenmann, 1912: 10 (type locality: San Juan River, Istmina, Colombia; holotype: FMNH 56036). Henn (1928: 84) remarks on holotype at Carnegie Museum. Ancistrus planiceps Meek, 1913: 79 (type locality: Tuyra River, Boca de Cupé, Panamá; holotype: FMNH 7580). Ibarra and Stewart, 1987: 8 remarks on holotype at FMNH. Diagnosis: Lasiancistrus mayoloi differs from all trans-Andean congeners except L. guacharote by having the head with dark brown base colour and lighter brown spots (vs. head with light brown base colour and darker brown reticulations or stripes) and the snout more acute (vs. rounded; Fig. 8), from L. guacharote by lacking abdominal plates (vs. abdomen with patch of plates medial to pectoral-fin spine insertion), from L. volcanensis by having the dorsal rim of the orbit slightly elevated above the interorbital space (vs. dorsal rim of orbit level with interorbital space), abdominal region pyriform (vs. rectangular; Fig. 6) and seven ribs, (vs. eight), from L. wiwa by having the parieto-supraoccipital posterior margin projected posteromedially (vs. not posteromedially projected; Fig. 6) and the posterior margin of the urohyal rounded (vs. V-shaped; Figs 7), and from L. caucanus by the suture between the parieto-supraoccipital and compound pterotic being concave (vs. straight; Fig. 5). Description: Morphometrics are presented in Table 4, meristics in Table 5. Abdomen naked. Body broadest anteriorly, narrow (depressed), with greatest body width at cleithrum. Dorsal profile gently ascending from snout to supraoccipital, flat to dorsal-fin origin, gently descending in straight line to dorsal procurrent caudal-fin rays, then slightly ascending to dorsal caudal-fin insertion. Body depth greatest at dorsal-fin origin. Ventral profile flat from snout to ventral caudal-fin insertion. Robust caudal peduncle almost triangular in cross-section: flaưened ventrally, with flaưened flanks converging to more acute dorsum. Twenty four median plates (mode = 24); three predorsal plates; six plates along dorsal-fin base; seven plates between dorsal and adipose fins; five plates between adipose and caudal fins; 10 or 11 plates between anal and caudal fins (mode = 10); three horizontal series of lateral plates on caudal peduncle. Parieto-supraoccipital level with nuchal region. Nuchal plate small and curved posterolaterally. Snout slightly acute. Eye small (orbit diameter 16.4 ± 1.3% of head length), with dorsal rim of orbit slightly elevated above interorbital space. Iris operculum present. Frontals, infraorbital, nasals, opercles, pterotics, sphenotics and supraoccipital supporting odontodes. Cheek odontodes robust and sharp (mode = 17, N = 35). Whisker-like odontodes present in evertible cheek mass and in some individuals at anterolateral corner of snout and oriented ~90° from head. Odontodes on tip of pectoral-fin spine slightly hypertrophied. Odontodes on lateral plates not enlarged to form keels. Lips covered with minute hemispherical papillae; papillae larger near mouth. Lower lip wide, reaching almost to pectoral girdle; upper lip narrow. Maxillary barbel short, not reaching gill opening. Teeth bicuspid; 44–70 less dentary teeth (mode = 63); 40–65 less premaxillary teeth (mode = 54). Dorsal-fin origin situated slightly anterior to vertical through pelvic-fin insertion. Dorsal-fine spine length shorter than snout length; last dorsal-fin ray reaching first or second preadipose plate when depressed. Adipose-fin spine curved, stout, not embedded; membrane present, easily visible beneath spine. Pectoral-fin spine reaching almost one-third of pelvic-fin base when adpressed; pectoral-fin spine reaching middle of pelvic fin in some larger specimens. Pelvic-fin spine reaching middle of anal-fin base when adpressed; central rays of pelvic fin extend beyond middle of anal fin base in some larger specimens. Unbranched anal-fin ray slightly shorter than first branched ray. Caudal fin slightly forked; ventral lobe longer than dorsal lobe. Tiny odontodes present on body plates and all fin spines with small odontodes, more developed on first two pelvic-fin rays in larger males. Dorsal fin I,7; caudal fin i,14,i; pectoral fin i,6; pelvic fin i,5; anal fin i,5. Twenty-six ertebrae (N = 4). Seven ribs (N = 4). Coloration in life: Head and body with dark brown base colour. Head with approximately naris-sized lighter brown spots; spots smaller anteriorly. Body with lighter brown wavy stripes; stripes forming four dorsolateral rows in some specimens. Specimens from Bayano River basin have large light brown spots posteriorly along the flank. Abdomen uniformly light brown. All fins with light brown bands. Adipose fin uniformly dark. Coloration in alcohol: Similar to live coloration but faded, with less distinct paưerning. Distribution: Lasiancistrus mayoloi is distributed throughout Pacific Coast drainages of northern Colombia (Baudó, San Juan) and southern Panamá (Bayano, Tuyra) (Fig. 1) and the Caribbean slope Atrato River basin in Colombia and Mandinga River basin in Panamá. Comments: Lasiancistrus mayoloi was originally described as Hemiancistrus mayoloi Eigenmann, 1912 from the San Juan River at Istmina, Colombia. Here, L. planiceps, originally described as Ancistrus planiceps Meek & Hildebrand, 1913 from the Tuyra River in Panama, is considered as a junior synonym of L. mayoloi. The earlier publication date of the former makes this the senior valid synonym. Exceptionally high interspecific COI genetic distance (> 3.0%) supports the recognition of L. mayoloi as a distinct species widely distributed along the Chocó biogeographical region in Panamá and Colombia. However, a high intraspecific distance value (1.73%) also suggests that this species could still harbour hidden diversity. Material examined: Pacific Coast, Colombia, Chocó Department, Baudó River drainage: CZUTIC 21298, two individuals, 81.6–87.1 mm SL, Urudó River, 5°13 ʹ 45.0 ″ N, 76°58 ʹ 01.0 ″ W; CZUTIC 21324, six, 35.8–104.4 mm SL, Salao Creek, 5°11 ʹ 26.0 ″ N, 76°57 ʹ 03.0 ″ W; San Juan River drainage: CZUTIC 21400, four, 44.4–110.6 mm SL, San Juan River, 5°19 ʹ 41.0 ″ N, 76°17 ʹ 01.0 ″ W; CZUTIC 21423, nine, 24.7–73.3 mm SL, Chato River, 5°15 ʹ 00.0 ″ N, 76°31 ʹ 01.0 ″ W; CZUTIC 21345 (c&s), nine, 39.5–91.6 mm SL, Condoto River, 5°05 ʹ 46.0 ″ N, 76°40 ʹ 06.0 ″ W; CZUTIC 21366, four, 79.21–70.0 mm SL, Iró River, 5°06 ʹ 34.0 ″ N, 76°40 ʹ 02.0 ″ W; CZUTIC 21386, one, 60.9 mm SL, Tadocito River, 5°16 ʹ 08.0 ″ N, 76°31 ʹ 03.0 ″ W; FMNM 56037 (ph), two, 2.5–85.7 mm SL, paratypes, San Juan River at Istmina Panamá, Tuyra River drainage: FMNH 7580 (ph & xr), one, 147.6 mm SL, holotype of L. planiceps, Tuyra River at Boca de Cupe. FMNH 26293 (ph), one, 82.5 mm SL, paratype of L. planiceps, Cana River; USNM 78311 (ph), two, 121.2–177.1 mm SL, mouth of Yape River; USNM 280394 (ph), one, 125, 3 mm SL, Tuyra River between Calle Larga and Pinogana above El Real Pacific, 08°07 ʹ N, 077°42 ʹ W; USNM 293418 (ph), one, 138.0 mm SL, Tuyra River 0.5 km above Boca de Cupe, 08°03 ʹ N, 077°06 ʹ W. MCZ88615 (ph), one, 15–36 mm SL, Pirre River, above El Real (Tuira Dr.), 8°06 ʹ 30.0 ″ N, 77°45 ʹ 30.0 ″ W. MCZ88614 (ph), one, 64–87 mm SL, Pucuro River 3–4 km above confluence with Tuira River, 8°00 ʹ 30.0 ″ N, 77°31 ʹ 30.0 ″ W. Bayano River drainage: MCZ57075 (ph), one, 84.0 mm SL, probably Canita River, on large rock ledge 0.5 km upriver of construction camp and headquarters, 9°13 ʹ 13.4 ″ N, 78°50 ʹ 41.1 ″ W. Atlantic Coast, Colombia, Chocó Department, Atrato River drainage: CZUTIC 21457, eight, 31.1–72.1 mm SL, Tutunendo River, 5°44 ʹ 39.0 ″ N, 76°31 ʹ 05.0 ″ W; CZUTIC 21488, two, 22.1– 59.8 mm SL, La Piedra Creek, 5°44 ʹ 31.0 ″ N, 76°31 ʹ 05.0 ″ W.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→