Mines in Alaska with subsetting by watershed and SASAP region, 2010 to 2016
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mining footprints in Alaska were analyzed by watershed and region of Alaska for years 2010 to 2016 for the State of Alaska Salmon and People (SASAP) project. 188 watersheds and thirteen regions were assessed for number of intersecting mining footprints, area covered by mining footprints, density of mines, and other mine data as described in "Mines.ipynb" in this package. Mining footprint data is based on an original dataset "Mining Footprints in Alaska" by Marcus Geist, Alaska Center for Conservation Science (University of Anchorage, Alaska) and provided directly by the author. Mining Footprints indicate “overall disturbance related to the mine which included tailings, roads, and buildings” based on best available aerial imagery, primarily from 2010 to 2016. Regions are determined by the SASAP project and watersheds are based on HUC8 definitions from the International Joint Commission and sub-sub-drainages from the Canadian National Hydro Network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".