MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948527925 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10406237

Scipopus (Phaeopterina) heteropus Lindsay & Marshall 2023, comb. nov.

2023· article· en· W6948527925 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioactive natural compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaChaetotaxyHead (geology)ExcursionGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scipopus (Phaeopterina) heteropus (Frey, 1927) comb. nov. Fig. 57 Phaeopterina heteropus Frey, 1927: 74. Scipopus heteropus – Hennig 1934: 321 (key), 330 (listed). Phaeopterinus heteropus – Aczél 1949: 342 (catalog). — Steyskal 1968: 48.15 (catalog). — Ferro & de Carvalho 2014: 60 (listed). Differential diagnosis Scipopus (Phaeopterina) heteropus appears to be identical to S. (Ph.) noturgidus sp. nov. in characters of the female terminalia but differs from S. (Ph.) noturgidus and other congeners by its black body and basally yellow mid and hind femora. Type material examined Syntypes BOLIVIA • 1 ♂ (examined and photographed at NHMW 2002); NHMW • 1 ♀ (not examined); Yungas; NHMW. Other material examined BOLIVIA • 2 ♀♀; La Paz, Chulumani, Apa Apa Reserve; 16°21′15″ S, 67°30′21″ W; 2000 m a.s.l.; 1 April 2001; S.A. Marshall leg.; DEBU (photographed, Fig. 57B–C, E) • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; DEBU0083 / DEBU083-06 sequenced for CO1; DEBU • 1?; Mapiri, Arroyo Tuhiri W; 15°29′08″ S, 68°25′8″ W; S.A. Marshall leg.; UGIC255-15/MYCRO156-15 sequenced for CO1–5; DEBU. Description LENGTH. 11–12 mm. HEAD. Palpus light brown, entirely pale brown microtrichose and setulose, narrow (length 4.5× height). Clypeus dark brown or black, width ~2.2 × height, bare. Frontal vitta dull, orange, darker posteriorly, microtrichose. Epicephalon dark brown or black, shiny, bare, wide (width ⅔ or more of upper frontal vittal width at inner verticals), clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta. Postocellar seta absent, one lower fronto-orbital seta absent; all other head chaetotaxy well-developed. THORAX. Scutum black, dark brown microtrichose. Female cervical sclerite slightly swollen anteriorly. Postpronotal lobe black, setulose on anterior half and outer lateral margin. Notopleuron black, with indistinct silvery microtrichose patch posterior to anterior notopleural seta. Thorax black, entirely silvery microtrichose. Legs black, yellow on basal ⅓ of mid femur, basal ½ of hind femur; fore tarsomere 1 black with prominent ventral golden fringe; hind tarsomere 1 black with slight anteroventral golden fringe. Wing evenly black-brown infuscate. ABDOMEN (J+ ♀). T1 with long, fine black setae. Abdominal pleuron of available specimens discoloured. FEMALE ABDOMEN. T1+2 ~1.8 × length of T3; posterior margin of T2 ~1.3× as wide as T1. Oviscape black, setulose, anterior ½ white microtrichose, ~3.5 × length of T6. Common duct absent, two paired spermathecal ducts arising separately from bursa copulatrix. Both paired spermathecal ducts short (3.0– 4.0× length of paired spermathecae), narrow, parallel-sided, swollen apically. Paired spermathecal stems narrow, longer than spermathecae, with sparse tubercles. Paired spermathecae approximately crescent-shaped, indented or pointed apically. MALE ABDOMEN. T1+2 ~2.3 × length of T3. T6 short, genital fork 4.0 × as long as T6, with arms converging. Epandrium stout (length ≈ height); basiphallus, distiphallus, phallic bulb, phallapodeme not dissected (no male specimen available) and therefore not available for description. Distribution Brazil, Ecuador, Peru (Steyskal 1968), Bolivia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBioactive natural compoundsFrench-language works237,207