MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948534565 · doi:10.48620/87111

Observation of the A Carinid Meteor Shower 2020 Unexpected Outburst

2021· article· en· W6948534565 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access CRIS of the University of Bern · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsApollo Microwaves (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeteor showerMeteoroidEclipticMeteor (satellite)Flux (metallurgy)Longitude

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present observations of the sudden outburst of the A Carinid meteor shower recorded with the Southern Argentina Agile MEteor Radar Orbital System (SAAMER-OS) near the south toroidal sporadic region. The outburst peaked between 21 UT and 22 UT on 2020 October 14 and lasted 7 days (199° ≤ λ⊙ ≤ 205°), with a mean Sun-centered geocentric ecliptic radiant of λg − λ⊙ = 271fdg04, βg = −76fdg4, and a geocentric speed of 33.3 km s−1. Assuming a mass index value of s = 2.0, we compute a peak 24 hr average flux of 0.029 meteoroids km−2 hr−1 to a limit of 9th magnitude, which is equivalent to a zenithal hourly rate (ZHR) of 5.7 and comparable to other established showers with similar mass indices. By further estimating the peak fluxes for other typical mass index values, we find that the outburst likely never exceeded a maximum ZHR of ∼44, well below the activity of other strong showers. The mean orbital elements resemble those of a short-period object, a = 3.5 ± 0.1 au, q ≃ 1 au, e = 0.72 ± 0.02, i = 55fdg8 ± 0fdg3, ω = 1° ± 173°, and Ω = 21fdg7, and are similar to those derived for two previous shower outbursts observed with SAAMER-OS at high southern ecliptic latitudes. Using the criterion did not reveal a parent object associated with this shower in the known object catalogs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Access CRIS of the University of BernSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207