MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948606606 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.11510179

Superficial White Matter

2024· other· en· W6948606606 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeodesicLaplace operatorWhite matterLaplace transformImage warpingDiagonalSurface (topology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generates surfaces at various white matter depths (default 1, 2, and 3 milimiters).The depths are calculated based on the real world image resolution voxel size and transformed to milimiters. MethodThis is done by first computing a Laplace field over white matter (cortex to subcortex+ventricles), and then shifting an exiting white matter surface along that gradient.Stopping conditions are set by geodesic distance travelled. Installation```git clone https://github.com/jordandekraker/superficial-white-matter.gitpip install superficial-white-matter/``` Usage with Freesurfer/Fastsurfer (example) > The code expects *standard* nifti orientation, in which the resolution is the diagonal of the header affine matrix. Running the inputs through `fslreorient2std` will ensure that everything is calculated correctly. ```bash# This is the freesurfer/fastSurfer Subject directorySUBJECTS_DIR=<path to surface subjects directory FreeSurfer/FastSurfer> # Subject to processSUBJECT=sub-01 # Output directoryOUT=<path to output directory> # Convert segmentation to NIFTIaparc_aseg=${OUT}/${SUBJECT}_aparc+aseg.nii.gzmri_convert ${SUBJECTS_DIR}/${SUBJECT}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz ${aparc_aseg} # Reorient to standardfslreorient2std ${aparc_aseg} ${aparc_aseg} # 1. Calculate the Laplace fieldpython sWM/laplace_solver.py \ ${aparc_aseg} \ ${OUT}/${SUBJECT}_laplace-wm.nii.gz # 2. Generate the surfaces for each hemispherefor hemi in lh rh; do # White matter surface WM=${SUBJECTS_DIR}/${SUBJECT}/surf/${hemi}.white WM_gii=${OUT}/${SUBJECT}_hemi-${hemi}_label-white.surf.gii # Convert white matter to GIFTI mris_convert ${WM} ${WM_gii} # Calculate the SWM surfaces python sWM/surface_generator.py \ "${WM_gii}" \ ${OUT}/${SUBJECT}_laplace-wm.nii.gz \ ${OUT}/${SUBJECT}_hemi-${hemi}_label-sWF_depth-done ``` > If you ran `micapipe v0.2.0` or higher check the example script: [`example_usage.sh`](./example_usage.sh)> `SWM` is implemented in [`micapipe v0.2.3`](https://github.com/MICA-MNI/micapipe/releases/tag/v0.2.3) API `laplace_solver.py````pythonSolves Laplace equation over the domain of white matter. Using grey matter as the source and ventricles as the sink.Inputs are expected to be Free/FastSurfer aparc+aseg.mgz in .nii.gz format Parameters----------NIFTI : str Parcellation file generated by Freesurfer/fastsurfre in nii.gz format (from mri/aparc+aseg.mgz).NIFTI : str Output laplacian file path (nii.gz) Returns-------NIFTI Laplacian image (nii.gz) Usage-----laplace_solver.py aparc+aseg.nii.gz laplace-wm.nii.gz``` `surface_generator.py````pythonShifts a white matter surface inward along a Laplace field Parameters----------GIFTI : str White matter surface in GIFTI format (surf.gii)NIFTI : str laplacian image generated by laplace_solver.pyOUTPUT : str path and name to the output surfacesDEPTHS : list [int | float] (OPTIONAL) DEFAULT=[1,2,3] List of depths to sample (in voxels) Returns-------NIFTI a list of strings representing the header columns Usage-----surface_generator.py hemi-L_label-white.surf.gii laplace-wm.nii.gz hemi-L_label-sWF_depth- 1,2,3``` Superficial White Matter © 2023 by Jordan DeKraker is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.281

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207