MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948795211 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10559672

VIEWS ON THE KINGDOM OF GOD IN THE GOSPEL OF SYNOPTIC AND JUDAISM

2024· article· en· W6948795211 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Christian Leadership and Education
Canadian institutionsTaylor College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKingdomPerfectionRelation (database)Meaning (existential)HumanityGospel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The Synoptic Gospels talk a lot about the concept of the Kingdom of God in relation to Jesus' teachings about the Kingdom of God, while Paul and other letter writers also teach a lot of it as an important doctrine for the church to know. Jesus not only taught the Kingdom, but Jesus also demonstrated the presence of the kingdom through His ministry. However, even though the Kingdom of God has come and entered the present dimension, the Kingdom of God has been working in secret until the time when the kingdom will appear in its perfection where believers will experience the fullness of the blessings of the Kingdom. The concept of the Kingdom of God is not a mere theoretical concept. He is truly present in the midst of humanity and gives new meaning to every aspect of the lives of believers. The five aspects discussed in this paper (salvation, a victorious life, prayer, ethics and the Church), represent only the broad aspects of the reach of the Kingdom of God. The method in this study uses qualitative methods in the form of descriptive analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.111 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it